{"id":"W2963728569","doi":"10.21083/surg.v11i0.4392","title":"An Evaluation of Crown Forest Management in Ontario from a Free Market Environmentalist Approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SURG Journal","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Forest management; Business; Certified wood; Christian ministry; Crown (dentistry); Stewardship (theology); Logging; Context (archaeology); Natural resource economics; Transparency (behavior); Environmental resource management; Externality; Sustainable forest management; Forestry; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Economics; Finance; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003698352,0.0002280096,0.0002868437,0.001966085,0.003673396,0.002196741,0.0008745969,0.0003649073,0.00265041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007294013,0.0001969344,0.0003464824,0.003394928,0.00141691,0.0008456885,0.00103804,0.0003429516,0.0001411449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1061079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06491745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9779579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952003,0.0007604062,0.0001411653,0.000190374,0.002803972,0.0009037533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929184,0.001092973,0.0007406746,0.0002673419,0.004070864,0.0009097156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001810243,0.001127411,0.7227022,0.0009700311,0.0002237184,0.001174418,0.02263073,0.02065283,0.003335062,0.01532916,0.01213775,0.1979065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006953242,0.0006210574,0.9470806,0.0001026492,0.0000551366,0.00004833455,0.01606563,0.007410756,0.000705267,0.0007460754,0.02704482,0.00005013422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.952522,0.0003748477,0.0006307344,0.0007525205,0.00001372892,0.0006133359,0.001503644,0.00002938413,0.04355973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911056,0.0002933718,0.001336398,0.00008796364,0.000007836368,0.0001624124,0.0006594668,0.00000879438,0.006338144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1061079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7698702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01766484135510955,"score_gpt":0.231536501722549,"score_spread":0.2138716603674395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}