{"id":"W2963731073","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.006","title":"Is that move safe? Case study of cyclist movements at intersections with cycling discontinuities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cycling; Pedestrian; Crash; Range (aeronautics); Classification of discontinuities; Collision; Probabilistic logic; SAFER; Discontinuity (linguistics); Poison control; Movement (music); Computer science; Transport engineering; Engineering; Simulation; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Computer security; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001503547,0.0001746039,0.000349364,0.0003114026,0.0000909011,0.0000339833,0.0001140594,0.00004777218,0.0006435643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002150259,0.0001497704,0.0002614592,0.00048001,0.00001469818,0.0003052868,0.00006987352,0.0001005665,0.00002784359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001156981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004838441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001131128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05004336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988732,0.0000464425,0.0003906222,0.0002510661,0.0002667258,0.0001719167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993708,0.00002786538,0.0001521182,0.0003672067,0.00003955611,0.00004244928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002257775,0.0001688841,0.925117,0.000008277425,0.003016894,0.00002822919,0.004832514,0.06555725,0.0001333014,0.000004305588,0.00004392037,0.001066832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001631823,0.0002246796,0.9145967,0.00009246294,0.003444981,0.00004093376,0.05494242,0.0232539,0.001316833,0.00002782265,0.00004002343,0.0003874006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944673,0.00007777692,0.004019956,0.000006792123,0.0001476621,0.0003755606,0.000001479493,0.00007981958,0.0008236992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957392,0.00003266507,0.00006579134,0.000005878659,0.00002171131,0.0000243993,0.00003172127,0.00002120344,0.004057432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0501099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9672909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01234679159963398,"score_gpt":0.2507909202824906,"score_spread":0.2384441286828566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}