{"id":"W2963848397","doi":"","title":"{Accurate and conservative estimates of MRF log-likelihood using reverse annealing}","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics","topic":"Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Mathematics; Markov chain; Markov random field; Statistics; Partition (number theory); Upper and lower bounds; Algorithm; Simulated annealing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Bayesian probability","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004950748,0.0001431179,0.0001981999,0.0001043882,0.00006027895,0.0001643646,0.0002909038,0.00005758151,0.00001762791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005949202,0.0001312615,0.00001716321,0.0001083892,0.0002256556,0.000244992,0.0001233943,0.0001191008,0.000006076429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002301292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001630267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000178176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003708719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988272,0.00008992125,0.0003677613,0.0002970271,0.000255767,0.0001623934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985116,0.0003472567,0.0001899718,0.0001535405,0.0006589853,0.0001386648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004403931,0.0000315844,0.00008411931,0.000008166104,0.00001840787,0.00001514388,0.00110818,0.00009499122,0.0007164133,0.8903719,0.0000934821,0.1074136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002970878,0.0001033433,0.00003637369,0.00004162163,0.000006079908,0.00001224224,0.0002213217,0.499337,0.003136988,0.4969505,0.0000357334,0.00008902761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004607025,0.00004644236,0.9928189,0.0007576594,0.0003638782,0.00009290557,0.0001332286,0.0000194448,0.001160544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4240721,0.00007645805,0.5755867,0.000204531,0.00002809194,0.000002172124,0.000007334832,0.000004436123,0.00001813861],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.499242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.535269,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2588405899942396,"score_gpt":0.4020975121392004,"score_spread":0.1432569221449608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}