{"id":"W2964319240","doi":"10.4018/ijmdem.2019040101","title":"A Biologically Inspired Saliency Priority Extraction Using Bayesian Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Multimedia Data Engineering and Management","topic":"Visual Attention and Saliency Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Contrast (vision); Artificial intelligence; Salient; Ranking (information retrieval); Frame (networking); Pattern recognition (psychology); Feature (linguistics); Bayesian network; Bayesian probability; Feature extraction; Tree (set theory); Computer vision; Machine learning; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032767,0.0008442413,0.000942282,0.002336285,0.0005675374,0.0009559154,0.001412864,0.001084352,0.001540133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003880257,0.0006443089,0.000934589,0.0008994687,0.0006942588,0.001849568,0.0008768911,0.0008091396,0.0003117099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001499869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001023124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009734219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008114329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993942,0.0001164585,0.00003245058,0.0001858184,0.0001879865,0.00008310987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991038,0.0003711524,0.00009114987,0.00004509863,0.0003183213,0.00007037527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000546427,0.0002920902,0.00549503,0.0004687513,0.0002314891,0.0004263704,0.0005860691,0.2801992,0.06700204,0.05599373,0.005011574,0.5837473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002190689,0.00007703125,0.00134948,0.00002022203,0.00003389079,0.00009527342,0.00003297416,0.974361,0.004253819,0.01855523,0.001173062,0.00002613364],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01483575,0.0003344147,0.9829075,0.0001500162,0.00002910993,0.00007660563,0.00005892746,0.0003498691,0.00125781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5735065,0.0004878795,0.4219651,0.0001912476,0.0001450456,0.0001662383,0.0002451381,0.0001260205,0.00316689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009734219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01935512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02642739941596673,"score_gpt":0.313632059952819,"score_spread":0.2872046605368523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}