{"id":"W2964436851","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011853","title":"Group Fairness for the Allocation of Indivisible Goods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fair division; Group (periodic table); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Fairness measure; Public good; Function (biology); Computer science; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001472265,0.0001282537,0.0003053155,0.00009114571,0.0001027832,0.00006620518,0.0008567871,0.00007919571,0.0001377669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003542534,0.00009230182,0.00014038,0.0003050134,0.0001542033,0.0001556116,0.00008219358,0.000133071,0.0001414075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002390244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001723188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008369196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006723172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987469,0.000007001045,0.0006909078,0.0002792205,0.00007825245,0.0001977477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985231,0.0002033847,0.0008293018,0.0002340237,0.0001850359,0.00002512899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006543544,0.00006757846,0.005036468,0.0001184861,0.00002493043,4.872237e-9,0.0008611195,0.00005558979,0.005804931,0.9844006,0.00003319177,0.003531715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000756695,0.000325951,0.002601917,0.0002402319,0.0000156545,8.886179e-7,0.001983175,0.01708156,0.1846774,0.7919696,0.0008111693,0.0002168411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626175,0.0001331722,0.0102305,0.001449085,0.001110716,0.001328414,0.0000515515,0.00002917189,0.02304986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998968,0.00002156286,0.000138952,0.0000545465,0.00006017282,0.00004719228,0.000001007191,0.00001350853,0.0006950515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.192431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3763959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1021758135876272,"score_gpt":0.2747536511323003,"score_spread":0.1725778375446731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}