{"id":"W2964436851","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011853","title":"Group Fairness for the Allocation of Indivisible Goods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fair division; Group (periodic table); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Fairness measure; Public good; Function (biology); Computer science; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006297975,0.0009769282,0.001470721,0.0009108359,0.001690074,0.003090149,0.002578227,0.002167686,0.006037178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01436626,0.0005194026,0.00123406,0.001820629,0.003395173,0.005325606,0.002219741,0.003371533,0.0007657975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003459943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002874608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002493901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002465092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961116,0.001828151,0.0001084751,0.0007630218,0.0006445482,0.0005442426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950377,0.003155974,0.0004316689,0.0008273587,0.0002768433,0.0002703717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006978883,0.000206813,0.0009318388,0.000203775,0.0000959899,0.0001107217,0.000544293,0.383903,0.00303561,0.5558587,0.003413433,0.05099797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008695479,0.00008660844,0.0001719136,0.00002692316,0.000033316,0.00005593771,0.00006902847,0.4733466,0.001799932,0.5200694,0.004234292,0.00001910883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0396337,0.0003849111,0.9497007,0.0009271342,0.00009254438,0.000118498,0.00008279311,0.000230201,0.00882962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.561318,0.0003692821,0.429027,0.0003578744,0.0001261142,0.0003117628,0.0001350194,0.0001997159,0.008155246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006297975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03330725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1021758135876272,"score_gpt":0.2747536511323003,"score_spread":0.1725778375446731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}