{"id":"W2964714837","doi":"10.1007/s10888-019-09428-4","title":"Losing ground in the income hierarchy: relative deprivation revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Inequality","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Planner; Social planner; Hierarchy; Relative deprivation; Value (mathematics); Generalization; Economics; Income distribution; Relative value; Interpretation (philosophy); Distribution (mathematics); Public finance; Yesterday; Econometrics; Public economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Sociology; Inequality; Social science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005051445,0.0003414933,0.001139853,0.003568647,0.004674212,0.006027303,0.001664172,0.001981368,0.007735245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01341875,0.0003243947,0.0004826061,0.004883665,0.02779716,0.00984814,0.006957546,0.006120684,0.0003520767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004788725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003070978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01776676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02353895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967312,0.00123476,0.0001371189,0.0003985441,0.0007270477,0.000771417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951945,0.001907114,0.0006916815,0.0004428887,0.0008225899,0.0009411601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004487461,0.00003240889,0.003489464,0.00005735141,0.00003175793,0.00009211204,0.005413395,0.0003046562,0.0001032601,0.9661955,0.002960988,0.02127418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002852711,0.00002621268,0.006701505,0.0001364862,0.00001875565,0.0001154063,0.008167663,0.000424075,0.00005731778,0.971463,0.01284457,0.00001645851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3045586,0.01532353,0.02168793,0.2558044,0.001305741,0.00007618309,0.0005585972,0.00006280242,0.4006222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923459,0.001868307,0.0009855354,0.002477098,0.0004372007,0.00001861116,0.00003536199,0.00001919253,0.001812629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01776676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03532666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05384651878439721,"score_gpt":0.3353593643608707,"score_spread":0.2815128455764734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}