{"id":"W2965407014","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019886","title":"Counterfactual Reasoning in Observational Studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Observational study; Action (physics); Focus (optics); Causal inference; Population; Computer science; Psychology; Management science; Cognitive psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Social psychology; Econometrics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006622623,0.000196742,0.0002939781,0.0001230756,0.00008603695,0.0001624623,0.00163732,0.00007768488,0.00004275322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004250447,0.0001479771,0.00007399867,0.0006267329,0.0001512014,0.0005641308,0.0003649916,0.0003300465,0.0001522074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007197262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001295077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002720728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001128365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981512,0.00001834419,0.0005354725,0.0004786116,0.0004998692,0.0003164394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985897,0.0001557771,0.0002724708,0.0002691973,0.0006635853,0.00004928556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002594911,0.00006241682,0.002325,0.00003214497,0.00001107552,2.833307e-7,0.001766798,0.0003700605,0.01042161,0.973746,0.00006732143,0.01117135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006269184,0.0002627839,0.002467906,0.001051111,0.000007386219,0.000005824802,0.001722356,0.3672508,0.1900295,0.436663,0.00007097796,0.0004055968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655834,0.0000882989,0.01965934,0.003838862,0.0007296957,0.0003837685,0.000003017035,0.00009093161,0.009622691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953551,0.00004946083,0.003920236,0.0003243439,0.00003140703,0.00001711161,2.736335e-7,0.000007846644,0.0002942487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.537083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6034333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2059506527187002,"score_gpt":0.352009713556374,"score_spread":0.1460590608376738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}