{"id":"W2965687105","doi":"10.1097/mcc.0000000000000650","title":"Challenges in conducting long-term outcomes studies in critical care","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","topic":"Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Attrition; Reimbursement; Medicine; Minimum Data Set; Survivorship curve; Term (time); Intensive care medicine; Long-term care; MEDLINE; Set (abstract data type); Health care; Nursing; Nursing homes; Environmental health; Computer science; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":3,"stratum":"aff_core","weight":5595.2375,"opus":{"tier":"T1","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Review of the methodological challenges of long-term follow-up studies in critical care: attrition, missing data, lack of standardized outcomes and covariate reporting, and proposed methodological solutions; the object is how this research is done."},"gpt":{"tier":"T1","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"It directly examines methodological challenges in conducting long-term critical-care outcome studies."},"grok":{"tier":"T1","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Review of methodological challenges in conducting and completing long-term critical care outcomes research."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04186623,0.0009736482,0.005869622,0.003836678,0.0006989461,0.004650949,0.002992949,0.002616166,0.00360865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1215163,0.0007239073,0.003410324,0.005393211,0.001819564,0.004214219,0.00215707,0.004204032,0.0009935308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002137306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01420079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003388279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006185151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9721797,0.01464128,0.006382109,0.001483776,0.004916121,0.0003969536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7460802,0.225421,0.01163743,0.002760449,0.01306554,0.00103556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001221089,0.00004060005,0.0005149323,0.3968322,0.001548565,0.00008492417,0.0003688224,0.0002789112,0.0001681226,0.004304401,0.01887531,0.5768611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001078769,0.0002215507,0.003686906,0.5932899,0.004334756,0.0005093972,0.0007718272,0.0001994579,0.0002288744,0.008061657,0.3885154,0.00007232724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007451193,0.9972073,0.0002692744,0.001635228,0.0004466825,0.00004537562,0.00006929647,0.000006617208,0.0002456661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001340224,0.9951193,0.00119915,0.00142098,0.0005523022,0.0002063331,0.00008209165,0.000008403885,0.00007124857],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9100692969751282,"score_gpt":0.6652137568702527,"score_spread":0.2448555401048754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}