{"id":"W2965687105","doi":"10.1097/mcc.0000000000000650","title":"Challenges in conducting long-term outcomes studies in critical care","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","topic":"Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Attrition; Reimbursement; Medicine; Minimum Data Set; Survivorship curve; Term (time); Intensive care medicine; Long-term care; MEDLINE; Set (abstract data type); Health care; Nursing; Nursing homes; Environmental health; Computer science; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":3,"stratum":"aff_core","weight":5595.2375,"opus":{"tier":"T1","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Review of the methodological challenges of long-term follow-up studies in critical care: attrition, missing data, lack of standardized outcomes and covariate reporting, and proposed methodological solutions; the object is how this research is done."},"gpt":{"tier":"T1","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"It directly examines methodological challenges in conducting long-term critical-care outcome studies."},"grok":{"tier":"T1","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Review of methodological challenges in conducting and completing long-term critical care outcomes research."}}}