{"id":"W2966062748","doi":"10.1364/oe.27.023432","title":"A modeling of dispersive tensorial second-order nonlinear effects for the finite-difference time-domain method","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optics Express","topic":"Photonic and Optical Devices","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Nonlinear system; Physics; Polarization (electrochemistry); Nonlinear optics; Frequency domain; Optics; Quasi-phase-matching; Computational physics; Mathematical analysis; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003481617,0.0003658898,0.0002653186,0.0002398087,0.0003130086,0.0004783274,0.0009836045,0.0008948134,0.002016531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000780707,0.0002135283,0.000377459,0.0002791982,0.0003347771,0.0005385389,0.00031754,0.0007015072,0.0004395732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004924691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001370015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004587497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004651243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998506,0.00003819975,0.000006494629,0.00001535943,0.00007713722,0.0000121966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997392,0.0000926674,0.00002499226,0.00002792756,0.00009621881,0.00001900142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006146385,0.0001306327,0.0009267975,0.0002649988,0.00004094172,0.0002083217,0.0001213146,0.7945963,0.07323091,0.09688443,0.001995745,0.03153816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002722682,0.000005824175,0.00003031461,0.000003260496,0.000001535178,0.00001873979,0.000002389446,0.9967451,0.001259522,0.0006496036,0.001277543,0.000003390515],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01034454,0.0001574697,0.9834946,0.0001205549,0.00008592986,0.00005075396,0.0001097119,0.0001309383,0.005505512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2881795,0.0004772973,0.6941712,0.0001237596,0.0000540032,0.0003277838,0.0004021169,0.000181105,0.01608323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004587497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009121597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009121444619907609,"score_gpt":0.2396766601052269,"score_spread":0.2305552154853193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}