{"id":"W2967004479","doi":"10.3138/seminar.55.3.3","title":"Hans Henny Jahnn’s New Masculine Ideal: <i>Perrudja</i> as Critique of Hegemonic Masculinity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"German legal, social, and political studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Hegemonic masculinity; Hegemony; Ideal (ethics); Dialectic; Sociology; Contradiction; Fantasy; Scholarship; Agency (philosophy); Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Reflexivity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Psychology; Art; Social science; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002380402,0.0002705135,0.0002243295,0.0006863654,0.005086881,0.004092188,0.0005286789,0.001615992,0.001405884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002176352,0.0001729999,0.0001276826,0.000406827,0.01648138,0.002923001,0.002441541,0.002429279,0.0002286109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008833299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003271357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01968416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02745084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980129,0.001148752,0.00003654419,0.0001614975,0.000423548,0.0002168022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995049,0.0002380603,0.00006045859,0.00006009289,0.00007039044,0.00006608031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001365165,0.000007513615,0.0001652132,0.00002001604,0.00000234966,0.00007101895,0.02078289,0.0001240123,0.0002366301,0.9667472,0.007149655,0.004679924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001056512,0.00002868961,0.0009974869,0.0001372821,0.000007850628,0.0003424783,0.0179485,0.0004445655,0.000817715,0.2437262,0.7355068,0.00003185802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1689539,0.03234088,0.01264587,0.1493183,0.003198041,0.00002892658,0.00005075335,0.00009766959,0.6333658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666182,0.001972436,0.001124999,0.003297892,0.0001940276,0.00001218965,0.000006842412,0.0000292851,0.02674419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01968416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06409043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03133823504169473,"score_gpt":0.3729089198795622,"score_spread":0.3415706848378675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}