{"id":"W2967198175","doi":"10.1037/xan0000217","title":"The power of nothing: Risk preference in pigeons, but not people, is driven primarily by avoidance of zero outcomes.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nothing; Psychology; Preference; Zero (linguistics); Power (physics); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Physics; Statistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005165469,0.0001771643,0.0004690984,0.00008069526,0.0001197243,0.00001259309,0.0001873832,0.0001935624,0.0004663111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006067947,0.0001206669,0.0001333104,0.0001312607,0.0002567365,0.00009690605,0.00005044384,0.0007761503,0.00002728739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001618236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008703774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005354299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003421605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982437,0.0003414649,0.0006947716,0.0002646794,0.0002135472,0.0002418016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984872,0.0002983501,0.000925198,0.0001211903,0.0001131016,0.0000549808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004048027,0.001007689,0.7856389,0.000008277678,0.0001532113,0.000007443107,0.007164227,7.697562e-7,0.1955819,0.0001793835,0.0009303581,0.00527984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002548776,0.004299638,0.9807662,0.00006618958,0.00004078044,0.00004842388,0.004019644,0.000001886562,0.006576366,0.0001885634,0.001294293,0.0001492395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906722,0.003891251,0.00003513008,0.0004866851,0.0004055842,0.0001628038,0.0000191106,0.000007448537,0.004319839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986342,0.0004876476,0.00008363622,0.0003747586,0.00001544027,0.000009602729,0.000002314712,0.00001143911,0.0003809981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1951273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5105779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05923840673529965,"score_gpt":0.3455376886477833,"score_spread":0.2862992819124836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}