{"id":"W2968723407","doi":"10.1177/0021998319867470","title":"Micromechanical evaluation of failure models for unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Micromodel; Micromechanics; Materials science; Representative elementary volume; Composite material; Finite element method; Stress (linguistics); Fiber; Matrix (chemical analysis); Structural engineering; Composite number; Microstructure; Engineering; Porosity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004869075,0.0006364814,0.0003201966,0.0004965781,0.0003536869,0.0002830682,0.0004874309,0.0006113633,0.001201298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093688,0.0002228375,0.0003187034,0.0001634733,0.0002563415,0.0002762485,0.000256119,0.0002531045,0.0002424403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004769514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005725272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003003915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003631676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998461,0.00003462923,0.000009110001,0.00002103741,0.00006936412,0.00001979152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995339,0.000245853,0.00006621709,0.00006142728,0.00007422508,0.00001839563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004218639,0.00004929747,0.001920715,0.00003660606,0.00001314007,0.00008250987,0.00007410186,0.9629801,0.0261576,0.001281509,0.0000838543,0.007278305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001865361,0.00002938183,0.0004240082,0.000002733225,0.000002051657,0.00001392124,0.000009304622,0.9947115,0.004510416,0.0001676815,0.0001228431,0.000004363094],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7596822,0.000282321,0.234603,0.0000741219,0.00002791369,0.0001139057,0.000190445,0.0005088451,0.004517203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807262,0.0001004479,0.01802131,0.000006686596,0.000003908721,0.00006490715,0.00006282197,0.00004027894,0.0009735422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003003915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005972862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02375928660952751,"score_gpt":0.2609366811240139,"score_spread":0.2371773945144864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}