{"id":"W2968956304","doi":"10.3390/rel10080475","title":"Animals in the Public Debate: Welfare, Rights, and Conservationism in India","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Parliament; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Hinduism; Identity (music); Animal rights; Battle; Ethnography; Sociology; Buddhism; Newspaper; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; History; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005105342,0.00007372263,0.0001036511,0.0002915472,0.0004704193,0.0002121664,0.0002542,0.00008074629,0.0002261021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001428995,0.00005878289,0.00003639288,0.0007196319,0.000212928,0.0002894037,0.00003540322,0.0002137908,0.0001224743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003877924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004928107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01584082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1186031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989837,0.0001936713,0.0001897947,0.0001722113,0.000199167,0.0002614109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.0002800316,0.00005589289,0.0001664543,0.00005334095,0.00004852627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003883172,0.00005796699,0.1783216,0.000003009899,0.000007466683,0.000009131297,0.006496537,8.132637e-7,0.00002732134,0.8079729,0.00707465,0.00002476626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021015,0.00003387778,0.7273347,0.00001796486,0.0000054233,0.000006044489,0.008680714,0.000009236673,0.00000268761,0.0288725,0.2347188,0.0001078874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8932346,0.0003338046,2.353097e-7,0.02862409,0.0001297173,0.0003323689,0.000004099991,0.0000297867,0.07731128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988127,0.0002307557,0.00005749668,0.0004736746,0.00002794956,0.00003946423,0.000004355159,0.000004685494,0.0003488754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7791004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01990156925494954,"score_gpt":0.2982246235568063,"score_spread":0.2783230543018568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}