{"id":"W2969439716","doi":"10.1002/cjce.23634","title":"Comparison of finite volume and lattice Boltzmann methods for multicomponent flow simulations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lattice Boltzmann methods; Finite volume method; Surface tension; Computation; Solver; Mechanics; Statistical physics; Volume of fluid method; Thermodynamics; Numerical diffusion; Physics; Flow (mathematics); Materials science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002669441,0.0001231783,0.0003357069,0.000124073,0.00003938481,0.00002632643,0.000144329,0.00006335208,0.00001873282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003163344,0.0001034028,0.00007752496,0.0001088875,0.00003779125,0.00009778218,0.00001372112,0.0002160014,0.000002009682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008837453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004204651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004241771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002606748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999199,0.00001344206,0.0004221587,0.00006489109,0.00009434384,0.0002061342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985541,0.0009090024,0.00008289437,0.0001293012,0.0001484003,0.0001763798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004982444,0.000003334806,0.001229953,0.00009855553,0.0001010748,3.439347e-7,0.0007277021,0.9686056,0.02804592,0.0001181979,0.00005684755,0.001007463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003776434,0.00001761129,0.0007475665,0.00005898456,0.00006522903,0.000004871985,0.00002833068,0.9802213,0.01427491,0.00007400803,0.004017777,0.0001117163],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9058378,0.001925434,0.09113609,0.0002498844,0.0004809071,0.0002466277,0.0000278733,0.00002860281,0.00006673152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557251,0.000001650881,0.04413596,0.00001346223,0.00007682401,0.000001842361,0.00000241519,0.00002684372,0.00001588859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04988726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4216643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0285664093156875,"score_gpt":0.3026602068356232,"score_spread":0.2740937975199357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}