{"id":"W2969439716","doi":"10.1002/cjce.23634","title":"Comparison of finite volume and lattice Boltzmann methods for multicomponent flow simulations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lattice Boltzmann methods; Finite volume method; Surface tension; Computation; Solver; Mechanics; Statistical physics; Volume of fluid method; Thermodynamics; Numerical diffusion; Physics; Flow (mathematics); Materials science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001954198,0.000696096,0.001191089,0.001211795,0.0008022403,0.001516435,0.002175871,0.001659813,0.0025693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006596255,0.0005354361,0.0006221457,0.001135864,0.0009359787,0.001728184,0.001371419,0.001284296,0.0006565608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001642523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00212153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01681961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01028185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989287,0.0004113378,0.00005863377,0.00006014663,0.0004453362,0.00009586276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957516,0.002731366,0.0001552867,0.0002640977,0.0007935768,0.0003041715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004558575,0.0003696441,0.002172325,0.0001787994,0.00008494933,0.00008922433,0.0001825851,0.9231828,0.005135618,0.02265916,0.0007261612,0.04476278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002172308,0.00001841949,0.00007999492,0.000006096261,0.000002397202,0.000005421155,0.00001203654,0.9978648,0.0007026253,0.0009719847,0.0003080671,0.000006526713],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3437594,0.002534008,0.6256837,0.001595922,0.0006827882,0.0004702102,0.0004138544,0.002599576,0.02226053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7401281,0.0008178626,0.2532508,0.0002100693,0.00006879173,0.0004940345,0.0003061079,0.0005782002,0.004146151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01681961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03344345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0285664093156875,"score_gpt":0.3026602068356232,"score_spread":0.2740937975199357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}