{"id":"W2969498990","doi":"10.1093/njaf/19.4.183","title":"A GIS Based Approach to Map Wind Exposure for Windthrow Hazard Rating","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Windthrow; Environmental science; Wind speed; Hazard; Terrain; Wind power; Meteorology; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Forestry; Geography; Cartography; Engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044814,0.0006655577,0.0003991182,0.002585628,0.0002854934,0.001196115,0.0005580744,0.000265846,0.008622328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001882996,0.0003953914,0.0002883149,0.001357136,0.0001725436,0.0008260278,0.0005006849,0.0002903894,0.002165657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003816263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005322574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008012919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009287224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996893,0.00008320231,0.00003797396,0.0000454733,0.0001280463,0.00001604843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999233,0.0002360721,0.00004680497,0.00009187157,0.0003525588,0.00003960189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002637513,0.0002880018,0.01886182,0.0004085368,0.0001437833,0.0006816596,0.001216816,0.07017221,0.02944893,0.00844339,0.02397194,0.8460992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001129545,0.0002611402,0.03501198,0.0001471551,0.000116468,0.000931684,0.002084495,0.8198645,0.04205152,0.01267433,0.08658307,0.0001605682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07043418,0.0001559572,0.8880243,0.0002640155,0.00005246047,0.0004505688,0.004807728,0.02123727,0.0145734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2826838,0.0001641598,0.7086142,0.00002751698,0.00001375888,0.0003748685,0.003060286,0.0004169511,0.004644372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008622328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02884454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01887889952527499,"score_gpt":0.2002781279396968,"score_spread":0.1813992284144218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}