{"id":"W2969586929","doi":"10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.6541","title":"Trends in the quality of abstracts of articles describing randomized controlled cancer trials (RCTs) from 1975–2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; Clinical endpoint; Family medicine; Sample size determination; Confidence interval; Descriptive statistics; Scale (ratio); Quality Score; Internal medicine; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2812411,0.001647869,0.00493516,0.08032276,0.00137316,0.01472219,0.003556691,0.003017084,0.003033307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6983182,0.001989613,0.006663545,0.07010262,0.002710876,0.007472135,0.005380759,0.002456622,0.0009713984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01745878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01803392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008083649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007796333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5395256,0.1105107,0.2573417,0.01136092,0.07879598,0.002465018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08675946,0.3791557,0.3758738,0.01231457,0.1408256,0.005070944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00887677,0.0002211096,0.334967,0.2331245,0.0193603,0.0007537917,0.008027603,0.001541731,0.004153029,0.002604755,0.05169729,0.3346722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002083316,0.00154361,0.6928309,0.1431579,0.01631601,0.004439817,0.004394494,0.001266723,0.003145966,0.003162781,0.1271132,0.0005452632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08110433,0.8692604,0.004277586,0.0196529,0.002027029,0.0009582755,0.01671494,0.0003135746,0.005690976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4713084,0.4643615,0.02389986,0.00774017,0.004001689,0.004183213,0.02248147,0.0003238037,0.001700051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7187588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8863576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.939348455631671,"score_gpt":0.7084923521184733,"score_spread":0.2308561035131977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}