{"id":"W2969623882","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scz034","title":"An assessment of engaged social science research in nanoscale science and engineering communities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; University of Saskatchewan; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Reflexivity; Legislature; Variety (cybernetics); Societal impact of nanotechnology; Sociology; Political science; Research center; Publics; Engineering ethics; Social science; Engineering; Nanotechnology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02534838,0.00006587191,0.0001270497,0.001910244,0.005442766,0.0001652333,0.0007688014,0.00004547046,0.00002860897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001450046,0.00005855936,0.000006772407,0.005413685,0.00539035,0.001733408,0.0004695462,0.0008391916,0.000003090895],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005538238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01480994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004310607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002361502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971332,0.0003552299,0.0002135496,0.0002597182,0.001171763,0.0008665526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976104,0.0003906971,0.00005807636,0.0003009329,0.001343181,0.0002967507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002177521,0.0001360934,0.107082,0.0001162366,9.690661e-7,1.112605e-7,0.06379156,0.0000035319,0.04107072,0.7814382,0.00008022406,0.006278151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000237099,0.00009383111,0.8823176,0.000060125,5.737962e-7,8.338571e-7,0.1082411,0.005107874,0.0000659981,0.0008636122,0.002913605,0.00009774521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737979,0.00003595563,0.000003529717,0.005777558,0.0002234693,0.000261969,0.000007842828,0.00001569014,0.01987614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993231,0.00006311687,0.0001920913,0.0002186477,0.00008975981,0.00002915592,6.611589e-7,0.000003829,0.00007959081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7805746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4270921373472799,"score_gpt":0.6382631639702969,"score_spread":0.211171026623017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}