{"id":"W2969808315","doi":"10.1093/wjaf/15.2.62","title":"Height Growth Models for High-Elevation Subalpine Fir, Engelmann Spruce, and Lodgepole Pine in British Columbia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Picea engelmannii; Abies lasiocarpa; Site index; Elevation (ballistics); Diameter at breast height; Montane ecology; Forestry; Subalpine forest; Environmental science; Geography; Physical geography; Ecology; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002878739,0.0001009736,0.000229034,0.00003617698,0.000093753,0.00008331294,0.0001914067,0.0001045049,0.0007234949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005870356,0.0001348417,0.00003858897,0.0001103765,0.0001397364,0.0003302165,0.00006095586,0.0001699414,0.00002092496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007532362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008405367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01702285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989238,0.00001301089,0.000417764,0.0002048143,0.0001806033,0.0002600432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995876,0.00003075284,0.0001723168,0.0001042336,0.00001167489,0.00009343863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001125267,0.001362371,0.8153026,0.0003050645,0.0001990965,0.0004101771,0.0008283865,0.0528136,0.0006119757,0.01195398,0.02497238,0.09011512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002388805,0.0002783051,0.9037763,0.00004559285,0.00003241648,0.00008062589,0.00004096809,0.0009875513,0.00007695417,0.08992082,0.002179522,0.0001921529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959646,0.00005234402,0.001180308,0.0001992219,0.00007321526,0.0003254776,0.000007853296,0.000009969718,0.002186939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968475,0.0002022771,0.001430832,0.0002804691,0.00007836606,0.00002768051,0.0000102895,0.00001681856,0.001105834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08992297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9499148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005027029717729781,"score_gpt":0.1827069315450425,"score_spread":0.1776799018273127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}