{"id":"W2969808315","doi":"10.1093/wjaf/15.2.62","title":"Height Growth Models for High-Elevation Subalpine Fir, Engelmann Spruce, and Lodgepole Pine in British Columbia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Picea engelmannii; Abies lasiocarpa; Site index; Elevation (ballistics); Diameter at breast height; Montane ecology; Forestry; Subalpine forest; Environmental science; Geography; Physical geography; Ecology; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008626292,0.0005317192,0.0003105231,0.0007491829,0.0005854554,0.001065297,0.001260367,0.0003853718,0.001826105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001512355,0.0002725821,0.0003764171,0.0006440707,0.0003535505,0.0003445472,0.000464893,0.0004602305,0.0003492917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006479362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004091472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8356581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.857578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997401,0.0000609742,0.00001181581,0.00006758272,0.00003817197,0.00008148052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991704,0.0003800654,0.00009465413,0.00003897255,0.0002116294,0.0001041778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002557061,0.0001362144,0.3783085,0.00008040536,0.0001311158,0.0003244888,0.0002635032,0.5900338,0.001954402,0.0018114,0.002323041,0.02437751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002361229,0.00003305378,0.1485392,0.0000226479,0.00003998978,0.00004529539,0.0002311697,0.8493001,0.0002485563,0.0005774788,0.0009167967,0.0000219529],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989995,0.0002534152,0.005359009,0.0001238461,0.000007239017,0.00002774364,0.00104437,0.0001446416,0.003044873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996648,0.00006265538,0.001047008,0.00001476626,0.000002285472,0.00001362939,0.0006373356,0.00001623666,0.001558043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1643419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3306195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005027029717729781,"score_gpt":0.1827069315450425,"score_spread":0.1776799018273127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}