{"id":"W2969817015","doi":"10.1093/wjaf/19.3.154","title":"Height Growth Pattern of Lodgepole Pine in Relation to Natural Subregions in Alberta","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Foothills; Site index; Diameter at breast height; Pinus contorta; Covariate; Growth curve (statistics); Natural forest; Forestry; Mathematics; Physical geography; Statistics; Geography; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001830309,0.00009892211,0.0001818772,0.0001368539,0.00002055471,0.000006473161,0.0002298313,0.00007096861,0.00006798369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001099111,0.00008708332,0.00004122077,0.0002249994,0.00007407545,0.0001572611,0.0001086512,0.0002446724,0.00006862191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000166883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001475968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000591274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01069008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990538,0.0000126242,0.0004308958,0.0001293109,0.0001808312,0.0001925281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995834,0.00002726905,0.0001999237,0.0001161501,0.000005884185,0.00006743545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002034714,0.0003087234,0.9487857,0.0000233134,0.00001718027,0.00008490108,0.001757125,0.04026877,0.0005537697,0.00700249,0.0001945631,0.0007999954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001179247,0.0001197108,0.9862047,0.00005968859,0.000007544069,0.00002324545,0.00008174999,0.0000316343,0.0006000011,0.01145499,0.0001461592,0.00009129915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948711,0.000009621481,0.0009697397,0.001220947,0.0001093928,0.0001584043,5.928676e-7,0.00000244388,0.002657793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992267,0.000008241705,0.000340259,0.0002957451,0.00002437272,0.000005698432,0.000002309439,0.000008512683,0.00008811206],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04023713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5965316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004599441154182243,"score_gpt":0.2002508622591936,"score_spread":0.1956514211050114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}