{"id":"W2969845001","doi":"10.1002/jcop.22231","title":"A scoping review: The utility of participatory research approaches in psychology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Psychology","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Indigenous; Citizen journalism; Community-based participatory research; Focus group; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Community psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04481635,0.0001338345,0.0008339938,0.0004168541,0.0006311901,0.000002872636,0.001458351,0.0002643996,0.0009398258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001955637,0.00009357134,0.0001115018,0.0007581044,0.0004202052,0.00009690672,0.0004417428,0.008174978,0.0001095037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000810393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001005705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001334761,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9641939,0.03250354,0.00209756,0.0001024742,0.000424965,0.0006774986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898412,0.006737149,0.0009768251,0.001687137,0.0005975443,0.000160199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002505147,0.003405362,0.6221528,0.025885,0.0001320975,0.00001489261,0.07330159,0.000003068045,0.000190802,0.0009804518,0.2134333,0.05799549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003193162,0.0009638126,0.8975937,0.0284333,0.00001939225,0.00005872529,0.01117271,0.00001662344,0.000007014389,0.008768704,0.04962126,0.000151621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9020433,0.02175109,0.00004772058,0.03642371,0.0009152715,0.00196027,0.000002067787,0.000008457402,0.03684814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664695,0.01471999,0.0002348203,0.0183784,0.00006076402,0.00007318886,0.000002440731,0.00001445404,0.00004646755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2754408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8247415632268107,"score_gpt":0.6764703729863987,"score_spread":0.148271190240412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}