{"id":"W2969894963","doi":"10.1615/rad-19.60","title":"A CRITERION FOR EVALUATION OF THE VALIDITY OF BLACK CARBON REFRACTIVE INDEX FROM MEASUREMENTS OF LIGHT ABSORPTION IN THE VISIBLE AND NEAR-INFRARED","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Soot; Carbon black; Refractive index; Discrete dipole approximation; Rayleigh scattering; Absorption (acoustics); Infrared; Materials science; Mie scattering; Carbon fibers; Optics; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Computational physics; Molecular physics; Light scattering; Combustion; Chemistry; Physics; Scattering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007879048,0.0008338956,0.0009878065,0.003927706,0.0009791519,0.001383329,0.001414054,0.002003561,0.0006570347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03169298,0.0003388698,0.0006088832,0.001085299,0.001869604,0.001464632,0.001458705,0.000820476,0.000599547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005780639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007676263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001156596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009803819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944566,0.001415644,0.0005986257,0.0008098671,0.002464875,0.0002542824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776873,0.01277522,0.00235968,0.002129213,0.004678623,0.0003699701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001386512,0.0002775678,0.2006127,0.001511803,0.0003364084,0.001235997,0.001107883,0.06043997,0.4831808,0.03633821,0.001765927,0.2118062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006617122,0.001055183,0.09795466,0.0004412774,0.0001948885,0.002605767,0.0005574408,0.4412304,0.4307389,0.01711661,0.007736532,0.0003022275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.396367,0.005355644,0.585093,0.0004126574,0.0001797388,0.0002515646,0.0006521294,0.0009804245,0.01070777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8245566,0.0004762428,0.1737523,0.00006650573,0.00004969879,0.0001527919,0.0003291026,0.00008468469,0.0005320163],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007879048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04166889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06450914379078394,"score_gpt":0.2957282545650622,"score_spread":0.2312191107742783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}