{"id":"W297004506","doi":"10.15287/afr.2012.55","title":"An evaluation of forestry journals using bibliometric indices","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Science Citation Index; Publication; Forestry; Index (typography); Impact factor; Citation; Field (mathematics); Library science; Geography; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01904302,0.0009849046,0.001826738,0.1153806,0.001014006,0.006407478,0.001237311,0.0007842328,0.002357674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1136664,0.0002949588,0.001359297,0.1095428,0.0008997138,0.006083655,0.002266048,0.0005046081,0.0008953332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001728887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002101909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001918734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002001503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.964634,0.006923524,0.00700374,0.001181843,0.01967889,0.0005779061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8538283,0.07504267,0.03454513,0.004996811,0.02968652,0.001900592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003769625,0.0003625386,0.7877218,0.002369617,0.001974613,0.0002327536,0.001461773,0.004769526,0.003163008,0.004011697,0.004166942,0.1893887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006191561,0.0006616253,0.9415128,0.0003821029,0.0008818558,0.0006275389,0.0024927,0.02933244,0.004708315,0.005327337,0.01385169,0.0001597099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047202,0.00838332,0.02251554,0.0008517303,0.0003541268,0.0007002495,0.01150073,0.0009032368,0.05007093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726795,0.002601686,0.01596032,0.00005424091,0.0005771,0.0003387953,0.006538233,0.00007026233,0.001179761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8846194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1007103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4174208698325085,"score_gpt":0.5207801377714607,"score_spread":0.1033592679389522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}