{"id":"W297004506","doi":"10.15287/afr.2012.55","title":"An evaluation of forestry journals using bibliometric indices","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Science Citation Index; Publication; Forestry; Index (typography); Impact factor; Citation; Field (mathematics); Library science; Geography; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01567914,0.00007956263,0.0001520724,0.006281856,0.0001514057,0.00002089156,0.000590034,0.00009691976,0.002832653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008105115,0.00006888745,0.00005528639,0.01380932,0.000452307,0.0009426873,0.0003601275,0.0001930268,0.00008183736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005050501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007575983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001948993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965093,0.0004971799,0.0003201936,0.0001602922,0.001941747,0.0005713619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998791,0.0001555811,0.0001879052,0.0004453374,0.0002349928,0.0001852054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002937718,0.0003997498,0.979666,0.00002367732,0.00002634476,7.913375e-7,0.0001934185,0.006049647,0.001453208,0.001253775,0.002119627,0.008784416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000188071,0.0002548725,0.9715248,0.00002100966,0.0000166602,0.000002440112,0.0001476655,0.003022535,0.006113908,0.01834819,0.0002952078,0.00006469509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915572,0.000816877,0.000078425,0.0001253164,0.00006729251,0.0003099148,0.00000348384,0.000005139631,0.007036295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991947,0.0002044327,0.0004507593,0.00002745777,0.00005642976,0.00001516848,0.000004014607,0.000008883398,0.0000381791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01709441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4174208698325085,"score_gpt":0.5207801377714607,"score_spread":0.1033592679389522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}