{"id":"W2970136003","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2019-0026","title":"Quantifying and easing conflicting goals between interest groups in natural resource planning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Compromise; Business; Environmental resource management; Variety (cybernetics); Public interest; Natural resource; Wood production; Ecoforestry; Biodiversity; Logging; Forest ecology; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem services; Interest group; Resource (disambiguation); Forester; Sustainable forest management; Conflict of interest; Production (economics); Intact forest landscape; Ecosystem; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00233072,0.0001070722,0.0001996411,0.000668131,0.0002001719,0.0002048363,0.000422835,0.00006515845,0.0003907432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003188354,0.00009820626,0.00004087675,0.0005021391,0.0002672544,0.0003940777,0.0001369893,0.0008636942,0.0001644165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003355107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009403326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01929363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09245996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982781,0.000175497,0.0003322367,0.0001805275,0.000348377,0.0006853024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989442,0.0003147667,0.0001078504,0.0001501571,0.00002368332,0.0004592984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001509209,0.000002400848,0.9938155,0.00001913263,0.000008846867,0.0001345129,0.001427435,0.000385652,0.0001081072,0.000498108,0.001220764,0.002364449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003946241,0.000112493,0.9666286,0.000309283,0.000003632769,0.00003668253,0.0006314254,0.0004593593,0.00002458735,0.0002306131,0.03105113,0.0001176297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857845,0.0003144079,0.000002207575,0.0005968947,0.0000892755,0.0001551445,0.000001595807,0.000003028475,0.01305299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988462,0.000005159389,0.0000877387,0.00005873574,0.0001392836,8.468408e-7,0.00000228161,0.00001608975,0.0008436739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07316633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1138071324289168,"score_gpt":0.3692846570865339,"score_spread":0.2554775246576171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}