{"id":"W2971079330","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2019-0150","title":"Automated scaffolding safety analysis: strain feature investigation using support vector machines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Construction Engineering and Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Support vector machine; Scaffold; Kernel (algebra); Computer science; Polynomial kernel; Machine learning; Strain (injury); Function (biology); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Feature (linguistics); Pattern recognition (psychology); Kernel method; Mathematics; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003163108,0.0002543743,0.0004346519,0.001238668,0.00005898292,0.00008134181,0.0001945129,0.0001484705,0.0004139481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005111095,0.0002792449,0.0002230889,0.001104028,0.00001896231,0.0003329071,0.000006704449,0.0003951176,0.000007427822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004224493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002986328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001597824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006133303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987658,0.00001612636,0.0004737078,0.0001342272,0.0001954398,0.0004146599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989879,0.00003985396,0.00009329904,0.0001971697,0.0001110272,0.000570724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001911412,8.380861e-7,0.005129632,0.00007615942,0.0004390017,0.00003399922,0.0002018142,0.9833071,0.01014284,0.000108263,0.0002508491,0.0003076557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002809086,0.00001880059,0.02748349,0.0001347746,0.0002124976,0.0002580659,0.00004706253,0.967669,0.0002388104,0.000007801926,0.003339641,0.0003091287],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9511853,0.0009829095,0.04204493,0.0001189401,0.003634048,0.0001759104,0.0001575573,0.0006646736,0.001035719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971328,0.00001188567,0.002513172,0.00001360203,0.0002037762,7.596213e-7,0.00002390934,0.00005780402,0.00004228186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04594749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005570454712673435,"score_gpt":0.1840949152681673,"score_spread":0.1785244605554939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}