{"id":"W2971621007","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-18-0233.1","title":"Evaluation and Comparison of CanRCM4 and CRCM5 to Estimate Probable Maximum Precipitation over North America","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Climatology; Precipitation; Environmental science; Climate Forecast System; Probabilistic logic; Scale (ratio); Climate model; Bivariate analysis; Estimation; Meteorology; Climate change; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Geology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004688814,0.001266551,0.0005662919,0.00278138,0.0007281628,0.001060697,0.002462963,0.0007870492,0.001740952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00726859,0.0003282045,0.0007205087,0.002196791,0.0002825169,0.0008247749,0.0009672947,0.0004093448,0.0004456058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00432666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005260251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6352729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6526203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985439,0.0003057986,0.00007432005,0.000278703,0.0006342395,0.0001631099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963164,0.0007085621,0.0002716999,0.0003012855,0.002176953,0.0002250567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001676933,0.0004467176,0.2924149,0.0004857781,0.001108878,0.0002385505,0.0003191054,0.4862669,0.007486177,0.002349581,0.01582438,0.1913821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001635917,0.00009231557,0.1014069,0.0000503701,0.0001212836,0.00002947407,0.0001753894,0.8883984,0.004111055,0.0002341417,0.005141051,0.00007598395],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9168176,0.0009232106,0.04404849,0.0006019667,0.0001460802,0.0005995227,0.01759082,0.006631796,0.01264053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196937,0.000157903,0.06205851,0.0001119242,0.00004012242,0.0002214616,0.01610483,0.0001977184,0.001413916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6352729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0201577439647474,"score_gpt":0.3107087602357296,"score_spread":0.2905510162709822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}