{"id":"W2971653688","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1908369116","title":"Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":438,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Negativity effect; Negativity bias; Psychology; Content (measure theory); Variation (astronomy); Politics; Social psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Confirmation bias; Political science; Neuroscience; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002726888,0.00006370096,0.0001672128,0.0001827139,0.0001604851,0.00001949983,0.0007842413,0.0001149975,0.0001111554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004431008,0.00004504322,0.00008804259,0.001578413,0.001156322,0.0006290837,0.00009081553,0.0001592707,0.00001174784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007331024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008847934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004008612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009242676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979771,0.00003521238,0.0003797307,0.0002495109,0.001197572,0.0001609244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985303,0.0005141277,0.0004014587,0.000008118314,0.0005078879,0.0000380698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001172825,0.0002100201,0.3657479,0.00004526473,0.00001109151,2.854758e-9,0.00424809,0.0002359799,0.3385488,0.2879656,0.002052913,0.0008170783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223573,0.00009925452,0.8853303,0.0001681659,0.000001671378,4.328632e-7,0.000891602,0.00006189841,0.00572366,0.1060179,0.001514262,0.00006848185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9547988,0.00002621928,6.013889e-7,0.01105368,0.00008990875,0.0002289009,0.00000589591,0.00000668907,0.03378926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982412,0.00003533868,0.0004461927,0.0005749607,0.0001248413,0.00001275841,3.161238e-8,0.000001597414,0.0005630702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5195824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.530465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2136827770253341,"score_gpt":0.4687330464406803,"score_spread":0.2550502694153461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}