{"id":"W2971835335","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n5p140","title":"Distribution of Deputy Mandates: Analysis of Proportional Representation in the Context of a Mixed Electoral System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kazan Federal University","keywords":"Proportional representation; Legitimacy; Distribution (mathematics); Remainder; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Competition (biology); Institution; Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Element (criminal law); Power (physics); Public administration; Democracy; Law; Mathematics; Geography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00544975,0.0001755717,0.0005311602,0.001686685,0.0009598274,0.002519728,0.001264151,0.0006137242,0.009961777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02346528,0.0002007282,0.0006753445,0.00162586,0.001564567,0.002201588,0.001788332,0.0008546293,0.0004206596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002206982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009362271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006203049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003714085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949054,0.003191634,0.000150548,0.0004973449,0.0005681498,0.0006871228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893458,0.00709084,0.001265769,0.0009208046,0.0008809856,0.0004957955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006655692,0.0003186488,0.11196,0.000189874,0.0002042632,0.001150743,0.005747081,0.03952608,0.001255562,0.7812394,0.002261275,0.05548149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109364,0.0007384647,0.1103721,0.0001009232,0.0001913084,0.0008420395,0.01284286,0.6748698,0.001528725,0.1823801,0.01595843,0.00006581502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468381,0.000187438,0.03091101,0.0006786596,0.00001706334,0.000171904,0.0002803048,0.00003943027,0.020876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946033,0.00004183178,0.003012903,0.00002703574,0.00001375842,0.00005595192,0.00008560713,0.000009445282,0.00215025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009961777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03332549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02478523790911427,"score_gpt":0.3435869367170872,"score_spread":0.3188016988079729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}