{"id":"W2972026449","doi":"10.1108/ijhrh-05-2019-0031","title":"Determinants of a high-quality consultation in medical communications: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Scopus; Critical appraisal; Competence (human resources); Family medicine; MEDLINE; Medicine; Qualitative research; Medical education; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Social psychology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009626127,0.0003942615,0.005132159,0.001381066,0.0001691443,0.000008719253,0.002727801,0.0005705317,0.00005435693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01679851,0.0002964171,0.000334004,0.0006018825,0.0004753713,0.0004314973,0.0005799126,0.002410318,0.00001097683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00123036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003224961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009299848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01004876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9604153,0.0252872,0.01169556,0.0003596957,0.001918775,0.000323487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9445127,0.03229665,0.0162307,0.001321526,0.005440118,0.0001982989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007389675,0.0001567494,0.0009412932,0.9358371,0.0001414657,0.0000185011,0.01897533,1.178207e-7,1.249548e-7,0.04130227,0.00002022116,0.002532878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009315669,0.0003042924,0.0003375803,0.9875031,0.0002254059,0.0000393525,0.004669736,0.00001305832,4.027433e-7,0.005041041,0.0007208644,0.0002135777],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002103513,0.9907831,0.000006155326,0.001657547,0.0006110523,0.004547731,0.0002511741,0.000007170845,0.0000325772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04056063,0.9574895,0.001044705,0.0003080519,0.00003761016,0.0004200561,0.00009063314,0.00002859048,0.00002021455],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05166598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6520508192380154,"score_gpt":0.6610705983868603,"score_spread":0.009019779148844886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}