{"id":"W2972153360","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1909.02168","title":"Future Frame Prediction Using Convolutional VRNN for Anomaly Detection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nvidia","keywords":"Autoencoder; Computer science; Anomaly detection; Benchmark (surveying); Artificial intelligence; Frame (networking); Generative grammar; Generative model; Machine learning; Anomaly (physics); Pattern recognition (psychology); Deep learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001625738,0.0002440998,0.0002230369,0.0002568902,0.0003286851,0.0001051331,0.0007826081,0.0004998207,0.00001322741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008765679,0.0003014847,0.0002675624,0.0004472617,0.00005864861,0.0003893011,0.0005434228,0.000436001,0.00002547525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003977442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001924584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000973085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001290022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984406,0.00004887032,0.0002075931,0.0009652257,0.00008303465,0.0002546824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984226,0.00004832711,0.0003003892,0.000856082,0.0002793263,0.00009325166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001178746,0.0002652406,0.003735691,0.0002831422,0.0002638968,0.00001209382,0.000156404,0.4803841,0.005692212,0.5026477,0.001157308,0.005284363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002695803,0.00008547088,0.001659836,0.00002914361,0.0000609336,0.00001009599,0.00003216001,0.9609593,0.00151467,0.02816667,0.006911972,0.0003001976],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09692609,0.000043224,0.9002773,0.00007200485,0.001064115,0.0007619838,0.00008829196,0.0005364636,0.0002305548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983488,0.00005693359,0.01524009,0.00006351497,0.0004531646,0.00001191434,0.00003403941,0.00001928727,0.0006331156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8865619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05903640244747482,"score_gpt":0.1940879681459536,"score_spread":0.1350515656984787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}