{"id":"W2972345977","doi":"10.1017/cnj.2019.20","title":"Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Constraint (computer-aided design); Argument (complex analysis); Blocking (statistics); Optimality theory; Linguistics; Political science; Social psychology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Phonology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001240658,0.0005891695,0.001117495,0.003013227,0.008393735,0.003052597,0.002053562,0.0008100387,0.01138813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007070635,0.0006005103,0.0003310601,0.00699932,0.003872442,0.001275247,0.003142903,0.001068502,0.0007397971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01043136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008242231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9230539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9622497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978014,0.0002472645,0.00008808705,0.0004781122,0.0006809817,0.0007041392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940399,0.001872063,0.0007417824,0.0005528556,0.002374272,0.0004191172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003388397,0.0005996737,0.4718072,0.001236433,0.000397774,0.003824405,0.3433342,0.0008630776,0.0565838,0.03013971,0.004964744,0.08286048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006413525,0.00009561176,0.8894336,0.0001464473,0.0001911671,0.0009140272,0.08384648,0.0007929959,0.006624469,0.001602783,0.01614601,0.0001422299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804584,0.0001728292,0.000295612,0.000110572,0.000006640641,0.00002460962,0.0004272817,0.00001366631,0.01849036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971597,0.00007826764,0.0003743468,0.00004147031,0.000002456058,0.00001357751,0.0004153112,0.00003498403,0.001879794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1547985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0350157492263493,"score_gpt":0.2415436096587761,"score_spread":0.2065278604324268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}