{"id":"W2972533333","doi":"10.1002/rem.21624","title":"PFAS Experts Symposium: Statements on regulatory policy, chemistry and analytics, toxicology, transport/fate, and remediation for per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination issues","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remediation Journal","topic":"Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada); University of Guelph; WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Superfund; Environmental remediation; Hazardous waste; Agency (philosophy); Regulatory science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Contamination; Waste management; Engineering; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007407086,0.0002008338,0.0002422477,0.00009766177,0.0002596693,0.00009463431,0.0001204893,0.0001512502,0.0003439789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006865642,0.0001829405,0.00004016827,0.000133751,0.0002020966,0.0007199132,0.0000295661,0.0001816218,0.000008911055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003000816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000546219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000451695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001279284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981643,0.0000796462,0.0004091576,0.0003795066,0.0005937076,0.0003736588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991338,0.000122821,0.0002521639,0.0001522721,0.00005639055,0.0002825267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000368428,0.0001222897,0.5644789,0.000122849,0.00006631737,0.000006912998,0.004783228,0.0001822169,0.3391361,0.0001683844,0.001842013,0.08872239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00489733,0.0008793341,0.8898739,0.0001273368,0.0000677958,0.0000887498,0.00236681,0.007304376,0.05689042,0.001127279,0.03567283,0.0007038013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922808,0.003999537,0.000170017,0.00220476,0.0001719756,0.0004267132,0.00003320785,0.00001843111,0.0006945707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879316,0.009598566,0.0002894228,0.0001792929,0.0002904613,0.0000210628,0.00005448181,0.00001982906,0.001615258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.325395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7460095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01410508418271566,"score_gpt":0.3055817411482582,"score_spread":0.2914766569655425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}