{"id":"W2972658791","doi":"","title":"Case study: Using limiting equilibrium analysis in landslide risk assessments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Geomechanics Journal","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Limiting; Landslide; Risk analysis (engineering); Econometrics; Economics; Environmental science; Computer science; Geology; Business; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002149476,0.0007452328,0.0005868649,0.001338907,0.001216336,0.001301663,0.001146103,0.001665104,0.00292918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005952158,0.0002967021,0.0005527122,0.00110456,0.0005708298,0.001253385,0.0008782896,0.0007242047,0.0003355845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008417018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007466043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01225914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02197045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990928,0.0004685814,0.0000501071,0.00007503295,0.0002183507,0.00009509781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970863,0.002054443,0.0001095843,0.0001667921,0.0004628908,0.000120014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007919228,0.001737175,0.03811775,0.0003186402,0.0001584288,0.006020803,0.001217315,0.8374346,0.008754721,0.02403517,0.002877627,0.07853588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007086436,0.0002854494,0.002952978,0.00002530543,0.00005349853,0.00051833,0.0006355989,0.9796339,0.006880586,0.006793203,0.002117391,0.0000328433],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8690516,0.0001300893,0.1114727,0.0003750713,0.00002498628,0.0002378172,0.0002983693,0.0004161041,0.01799318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958043,0.00006042001,0.03952426,0.00002177733,0.000006573473,0.00004928582,0.000094929,0.00003732727,0.002162387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01225914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02437562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04951661375571176,"score_gpt":0.2938532255757644,"score_spread":0.2443366118200526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}