{"id":"W2973202414","doi":"10.1017/cnj.2019.22","title":"On the role of person in the mapping of syntactic features onto their interpretable counterparts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Argument (complex analysis); Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Representation (politics); Focus (optics); Word grammar; Grammar; Subject (documents); Computer science; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Relational grammar; Emergent grammar; Philosophy; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003401124,0.0002516793,0.0004887946,0.0003528879,0.0002839906,0.0001946787,0.001049205,0.0001204549,0.0001576306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02293317,0.0001535041,0.0001913896,0.0001343342,0.0003408388,0.00002412907,0.00001917403,0.0008848138,0.000003898414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005196277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00124611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2785709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8682417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978921,0.0004494532,0.0007404686,0.0001749069,0.000193099,0.0005500137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938374,0.002936757,0.0009774996,0.0005870782,0.001446067,0.0002152687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003842088,0.00002155761,0.002016143,0.0000868996,0.00009183241,0.00006623308,0.2304652,0.0003386326,0.00004455235,0.7666104,0.0001482946,0.00007177428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009831467,0.0008850851,0.009723469,0.005768131,0.0004453397,0.0005145716,0.2589589,0.006249787,0.0006849892,0.5330904,0.1818442,0.0008519631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9027511,0.0008523104,0.00003278639,0.007319596,0.004034822,0.0005759803,0.0001831678,0.000008167761,0.08424199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971325,0.00001173008,0.00008589163,0.0004428639,0.001955385,0.000006061312,0.000004846761,0.00003921944,0.0003214854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5896708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01434206610820811,"score_gpt":0.2048694908136763,"score_spread":0.1905274247054682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}