{"id":"W2973239684","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.010","title":"Comparison of bias adjustment methods in meta-analysis suggests that quality effects modeling may have less limitations than other approaches","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Meta-analysis; Publication bias; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Econometrics; Quality (philosophy); Selection bias; Statistics; Medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4064844,0.004468098,0.01741157,0.008645968,0.001533565,0.009021418,0.005986348,0.004797443,0.00493728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6326015,0.002449241,0.04016878,0.01022037,0.002519839,0.007609105,0.003509884,0.007704668,0.0006984963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003112778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005849417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005790059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007065953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5304599,0.3972346,0.04219668,0.01230135,0.0168232,0.0009842688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2192463,0.7411039,0.01467767,0.01611758,0.008495537,0.0003591068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004181982,0.0002040806,0.01959737,0.1073581,0.5034417,0.000212006,0.001232762,0.01357388,0.0006341056,0.0297635,0.00538779,0.3144127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008510175,0.002846187,0.02910468,0.05585268,0.619236,0.00116589,0.0006324385,0.06143533,0.003204025,0.1864186,0.03058344,0.001010524],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006894433,0.2390009,0.7423831,0.003814033,0.001879488,0.002419891,0.001093489,0.000689413,0.001825226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2391858,0.08300232,0.6599993,0.006395184,0.001220425,0.00695379,0.001319693,0.0007356292,0.001187882],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5935156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7319105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9963492713835682,"score_gpt":0.7933603616672651,"score_spread":0.2029889097163031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}