{"id":"W2973331451","doi":"10.1177/1556264619872369","title":"Epistemic Strategies in Ethical Review: REB Members’ Experiences of Assessing Probable Impacts of Research for Human Subjects","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Ethos; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Ethics committee; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1772724,0.001039694,0.001145346,0.002448653,0.02047282,0.01486801,0.003868088,0.008019911,0.003111807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3495104,0.001432111,0.001268662,0.001566162,0.02557538,0.01365795,0.0232492,0.01319839,0.0009469872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01121612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01869559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008553222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01706323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6252272,0.3402791,0.008037144,0.004239697,0.01452834,0.007688488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5758418,0.3318373,0.02836953,0.01453206,0.02571703,0.02370225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008495034,0.00004742912,0.002406241,0.0002368787,0.00002797515,0.001184531,0.9792134,0.00009993648,0.0006092881,0.002790002,0.002273546,0.01102588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002680734,0.0001629452,0.001790205,0.0006549676,0.00002684116,0.002074164,0.9415187,0.0003932516,0.0005367106,0.00423398,0.04844286,0.0001385599],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8811251,0.007336248,0.02717591,0.05091333,0.001214649,0.0006485564,0.00007328395,0.0002178051,0.03129497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841866,0.001400071,0.006510263,0.004539746,0.0001416223,0.0002830393,0.00003648877,0.0001017836,0.002800401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.937517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8965501402765865,"score_gpt":0.7749316804842633,"score_spread":0.1216184597923232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}