{"id":"W2973387597","doi":"10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.1","title":"Visions of the Possible: Engaging with Librarians in SoTL","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; Reflection (computer programming); Scholarship; Sociology; Critical reflection; Work (physics); Discipline; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Teaching method; Teaching and learning center","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007760539,0.0001179934,0.00016417,0.0001474327,0.002237254,0.000327002,0.0008689233,0.00007454887,0.0001751281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002699248,0.0000598763,0.00007677904,0.0005003837,0.0003513381,0.001022025,0.0001109205,0.003620415,0.000021599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002343689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007017736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009567348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945052,0.004006242,0.0003069393,0.000171368,0.0006531605,0.0003570409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975429,0.001382557,0.0006412343,0.0002804921,0.00008541996,0.00006735513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004217131,0.0000870544,0.5317926,0.00000577372,0.00003792194,0.000002287909,0.4336694,0.008643027,0.0009480403,0.006299854,0.0002040557,0.01826783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009452494,0.0002804759,0.4137979,0.0009865876,0.00008521511,0.0001606882,0.4205729,0.001340993,0.0002256809,0.005382497,0.1558281,0.0003937261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.947709,0.0001027203,0.0004833344,0.01201392,0.001357955,0.0002099049,1.297927e-7,0.00003697992,0.03808605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954283,0.00004978074,0.001039533,0.000210959,0.0005875408,0.000003013775,2.621398e-7,0.00002443338,0.002656224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.155624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02482347659945885,"score_gpt":0.3625020456579074,"score_spread":0.3376785690584486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}