{"id":"W2973453577","doi":"10.1061/(asce)ps.1949-1204.0000407","title":"A Review of Failure Prediction Models for Oil and Gas Pipelines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Pipeline (software); Fossil fuel; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Domain (mathematical analysis); Predictive modelling; Forensic engineering; Reliability engineering; Petroleum engineering; Computer science; Machine learning; Business; Waste management; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002259206,0.001718347,0.001500803,0.003978472,0.000323866,0.001297033,0.002228829,0.001352819,0.002662542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059349,0.0007861287,0.002011801,0.004329471,0.0003895726,0.001977755,0.0005953682,0.001340849,0.00133004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007862666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00214911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006771204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004616585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990824,0.0002046477,0.0001488438,0.0001994164,0.0003218597,0.00004278867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995901,0.002740311,0.0003145093,0.0001135386,0.0008790249,0.00005163021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006673403,0.0001160706,0.001857957,0.02395846,0.0003413893,0.0001746736,0.0001466803,0.02914819,0.001066485,0.009976101,0.02484129,0.9083059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003223347,0.000530098,0.007766701,0.02751338,0.001363602,0.001412262,0.0003401703,0.06974337,0.003144869,0.01895779,0.868929,0.0002665904],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001317707,0.9732149,0.02134624,0.0007092814,0.0004090113,0.00003767179,0.0003233103,0.000112308,0.002529496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01117808,0.976514,0.01012601,0.0002162913,0.0004194088,0.00004941841,0.0005142356,0.00002496472,0.0009575511],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006771204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01346362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03987046013654098,"score_gpt":0.3021199621734066,"score_spread":0.2622495020368656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}