{"id":"W2973489302","doi":"10.1007/s40258-019-00511-5","title":"Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of a Suicide Prevention Campaign Implemented in Ontario, Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","topic":"Suicide and Self-Harm Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Psychological intervention; Medicine; Quality-adjusted life year; Suicide prevention; Health economics; Cost effectiveness; Poison control; Cost–benefit analysis; Economic evaluation; Health administration; Confidence interval; Gerontology; Demography; Environmental health; Psychiatry; Nursing; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006094133,0.001319447,0.001286536,0.001191631,0.003134018,0.002404353,0.00230863,0.001916114,0.003946397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02511376,0.0008534205,0.002098189,0.002580233,0.002129334,0.001003628,0.001473424,0.002028842,0.0002001104],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2329547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2499444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916318,0.003620514,0.0004576416,0.0003816844,0.001731738,0.002176756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806651,0.006468785,0.002669735,0.0004928632,0.005815902,0.003887617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1023337,0.02821669,0.4107709,0.00752906,0.008648533,0.0009075698,0.002838297,0.2000385,0.002358073,0.006813219,0.02445797,0.2050875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.034558,0.04881035,0.770639,0.001740915,0.00749316,0.0001580719,0.006840787,0.1143897,0.002087824,0.001879251,0.01096596,0.0004370394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841672,0.00149283,0.0004072105,0.00273037,0.0001094153,0.002671989,0.002721162,0.00004307781,0.005656619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947169,0.000906376,0.001082117,0.00053523,0.00002644035,0.0005639621,0.0007500969,0.000007229202,0.001411736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2329547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8896638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1415913194765217,"score_gpt":0.4636477171342946,"score_spread":0.3220563976577729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}