{"id":"W2973795994","doi":"10.1111/eva.12871","title":"Evaluating genomic data for management of local adaptation in a changing climate: A lodgepole pine case study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolutionary Applications","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Alberta Innovates Bio Solutions; Forest Genetics Council of British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Biology; Local adaptation; Pinus contorta; Adaptation (eye); Phenotypic trait; Evolutionary biology; Phenotypic plasticity; Ecology; Phenotype; Ecological genetics; Genetics; Gene; Demography; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001913293,0.0001483223,0.0001552462,0.0007805947,0.001040477,0.0008823533,0.0003675125,0.0002338665,0.0004625143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003340191,0.00005177165,0.0001447449,0.001398027,0.0004933884,0.0001987883,0.0003901398,0.0002495988,0.00003641889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002221685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002057629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3384029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7032933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992945,0.00029503,0.00003183105,0.0001035202,0.0001901615,0.00008500074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984854,0.0005581263,0.0002390112,0.000146781,0.0004116127,0.0001591614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001895187,0.0002441888,0.8934386,0.00008588623,0.000142981,0.004038352,0.004408595,0.004083383,0.01392912,0.001697912,0.0007327407,0.07700862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000306891,0.0003100976,0.9779812,0.000042303,0.0001009424,0.001254931,0.006725823,0.003710523,0.003376236,0.0007066131,0.005728669,0.00003182861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966512,0.0001419838,0.001579848,0.0001177345,0.000002828279,0.00004387291,0.0002844211,0.00001679124,0.001161272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932376,0.00008017886,0.006172223,0.00003442397,0.000002356437,0.00001110412,0.0002226964,0.000004294566,0.000235051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3384029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6728663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05416287337077508,"score_gpt":0.3398265827424278,"score_spread":0.2856637093716527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}