{"id":"W2973804033","doi":"10.1007/s11538-019-00665-2","title":"Compensatory Foraging in Stoichiometric Producer–Grazer Models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Foraging; Optimal foraging theory; Predation; Biology; Trophic level; Ecology; Nutrient; Grazing; Population; Ecological stoichiometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000459672,0.00008480021,0.0002541721,0.00008752692,0.00002430836,0.000001729956,0.0001480358,0.00007979648,0.004460625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001366455,0.00006873748,0.0000360259,0.0001785955,0.0002215328,0.00001461362,0.0001747223,0.0001023455,0.001989954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003821822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003877149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001980248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001659009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991789,0.00007043531,0.0002694144,0.000217532,0.00006965659,0.0001940522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993715,0.0003587048,0.00007995981,0.0001572569,0.000007869187,0.00002469613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005466253,0.0007822204,0.6756055,0.0002298301,0.00005271996,0.000004582391,0.001057231,0.005146998,0.003116739,0.3095785,0.002072433,0.002298585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002133247,0.0005684611,0.2160521,0.00009397896,0.00003237889,0.00002258521,0.0004681383,0.05376067,0.0005315167,0.7153537,0.01032196,0.0006612148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9237947,0.00006451562,0.000919476,0.0009508982,0.00005730123,0.0002596169,0.000001557207,0.00001470114,0.07393721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945778,0.000009884053,0.004426057,0.0001997985,0.000004515184,0.00001811687,0.000001905368,0.000005773793,0.000756152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4595534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01344189172476777,"score_gpt":0.2392848344393448,"score_spread":0.225842942714577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}