{"id":"W2974095620","doi":"10.1002/edn3.29","title":"Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":566,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Victoria","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; Innovate BC; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Standardization; Detection limit; Computational biology; Biology; Limit (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Data mining; Computer science; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Biodiversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062107,0.0002678151,0.0002802295,0.00003336444,0.0003834887,0.000021698,0.0002558781,0.0001120803,0.0008434019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005110634,0.0002269072,0.0001426379,0.00006730588,0.000697981,0.0002856795,0.0003868979,0.0001449255,0.0005765661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003329283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001252021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002897687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001018955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978054,0.0000691236,0.0006932011,0.0006214528,0.000472942,0.0003378714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984276,0.0001586725,0.0008575524,0.0004753294,7.362542e-7,0.00008015367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003120857,0.00009835308,0.4110963,0.0000110949,0.00002645959,7.181841e-7,0.0002872116,0.00007474902,0.5800162,0.000007719574,0.00009657891,0.008253432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004543879,0.0002059579,0.7899522,0.00000858016,0.00005501999,0.00001495442,0.00120803,0.0003813113,0.2017274,0.00006645863,0.005686133,0.0002394839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964284,0.000141202,0.0002262233,0.0001452121,0.0001958062,0.001084432,0.00009490542,0.00002625664,0.00165759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972605,0.0001790366,0.0009483593,0.0001102793,0.00002907953,0.00005553012,0.00004343725,0.00002840115,0.001345395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3788559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9253007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02239968010380166,"score_gpt":0.221611921267427,"score_spread":0.1992122411636253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}