{"id":"W2974368360","doi":"10.1108/jm2-06-2018-0081","title":"Analysis of supply chain risk in the ceramic industry using the TOPSIS method under a fuzzy environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modelling in Management","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Supply chain risk management; TOPSIS; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Supply chain management; Quality (philosophy); Risk management; Operations management; Service management; Operations research; Marketing; Economics; Engineering; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002635472,0.0007845471,0.00067336,0.006059949,0.001342465,0.002856373,0.0006093671,0.0004697096,0.003823644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004864983,0.0003590615,0.001644095,0.00464304,0.0006141886,0.001391621,0.001029158,0.000783276,0.0002209472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002716305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003715527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01479769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01613516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972155,0.001060364,0.0002651922,0.0001774348,0.001133593,0.0001477935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965543,0.001952766,0.0005925753,0.00006953699,0.0007504367,0.00008044767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006497349,0.0004858162,0.09280994,0.003394987,0.001324669,0.003152434,0.01121128,0.4238043,0.01944861,0.0454246,0.002476283,0.3958173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065074,0.0009345636,0.03773544,0.0006041798,0.0005277802,0.0009185215,0.01963481,0.8988653,0.006841438,0.02808846,0.005575154,0.000209207],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.431302,0.00109295,0.5442497,0.0006731704,0.00007461874,0.001447904,0.0007116759,0.0002043677,0.02024377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8612815,0.0009408856,0.1354022,0.00002419552,0.00001129671,0.0003214274,0.0002109619,0.000009940187,0.00179753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01479769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02942312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02522617159326471,"score_gpt":0.2626337222208473,"score_spread":0.2374075506275826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}