{"id":"W2975664092","doi":"10.1177/1359105319873958","title":"A dyadic approach to understanding safer sex behavior in intimate heterosexual relationships","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Psychology","topic":"Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Condom; Psychology; Safer sex; Social psychology; Variance (accounting); SAFER; Heterosexuality; Partner effects; Sexual behavior; Developmental psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Homosexuality; Medicine; Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002708131,0.0004499674,0.0005422868,0.001404243,0.001467612,0.001670117,0.000617103,0.0003962003,0.002273784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006682249,0.0002859754,0.0004235515,0.0009478647,0.0009816249,0.002786675,0.001771966,0.000947643,0.0001354274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001153749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001363875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01596958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02645478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975617,0.002027835,0.00004933185,0.0001769476,0.0001189315,0.00006525892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976545,0.001643054,0.0002484539,0.0001599692,0.0001556808,0.0001383419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002585934,0.0009839177,0.5399388,0.0008001056,0.0005809097,0.0009023066,0.1496326,0.005322424,0.003401962,0.05092408,0.001172276,0.2460819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008037571,0.001253995,0.653419,0.0009597607,0.000993395,0.002669649,0.1678446,0.05185264,0.001798844,0.09306647,0.02587144,0.0001899394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9000626,0.00520541,0.07702655,0.001492598,0.00005385344,0.0002171935,0.0002239113,0.00003885023,0.01567905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757296,0.002119538,0.02107662,0.0001191527,0.0000170582,0.0002019758,0.0001165739,0.000007873214,0.0006114393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01596958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03175324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4320089402430492,"score_gpt":0.533360617104354,"score_spread":0.1013516768613048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}