{"id":"W2975821877","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000766","title":"Isolating the contribution of perceptual fluency to judgments of learning (JOLs): Evidence for reactivity in measuring the influence of fluency.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metamemory; Psychology; Fluency; Cognitive psychology; PsycINFO; Perception; Task (project management); Metacognition; Processing fluency; Stimulus (psychology); Cognition; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001728439,0.0001238235,0.000317736,0.000136548,0.0001619224,0.00001535699,0.0002485834,0.00007299984,0.00002948255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002742819,0.00008485683,0.00008486445,0.0002683811,0.0002384471,0.0005833361,0.00005347543,0.0004504854,0.000001792873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000245928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004536808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001119997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001150889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980509,0.0005091633,0.0007065549,0.0002299837,0.0003193107,0.0001840539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974734,0.001012738,0.001085243,0.000117485,0.0002719237,0.00003923821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00105909,0.0001063292,0.01620095,0.0000441199,0.00001005846,0.000001126404,0.00366619,0.004717683,0.972652,0.00004838814,0.000001564958,0.00149251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001245007,0.002343782,0.05925637,0.0009012017,0.0000282512,0.000072375,0.006266796,0.0003171868,0.9292112,0.0002377884,0.00001766951,0.0001023786],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983823,0.000487299,0.0001808107,0.000139245,0.0001412608,0.0004054145,0.000001214978,0.000004259931,0.0002581496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995369,0.0001154631,0.00007831483,0.0002003675,0.00003173023,0.00001385464,3.74927e-7,0.000007872845,0.00001511415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0434408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3460361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0749914647355964,"score_gpt":0.3725967302840635,"score_spread":0.2976052655484671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}