{"id":"W2975881488","doi":"10.5539/jas.v11n17p218","title":"The Efficiency of Sampling Methods for Dendrometric Estimates of Thinned Stands of Pinus taeda L. in Santa Catarina, Brazil","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Science","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina","keywords":"Hectare; Mathematics; Sampling (signal processing); Estimator; Pinus <genus>; Statistics; Efficiency; Sample size determination; Sample (material); Forestry; Environmental science; Animal science; Ecology; Botany; Biology; Geography; Chemistry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003391401,0.0003257941,0.0002703801,0.001309706,0.0003433538,0.0006113033,0.0004928734,0.0002011577,0.0002413395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00848505,0.0001939846,0.0002618129,0.0008085746,0.0003277783,0.0003946469,0.0003791723,0.000144475,0.0001516491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005288457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003307813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01521442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04681691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971527,0.00123,0.0001573782,0.0004647933,0.0009217075,0.00007337495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954067,0.002513357,0.000736812,0.0004492482,0.0008292085,0.00006475171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000334934,0.00006956093,0.7983481,0.0003239292,0.0002205293,0.0001324471,0.00235064,0.004999218,0.02905513,0.0005511758,0.000190928,0.1634235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000194587,0.0004359863,0.9405337,0.0001585061,0.0001615516,0.0003682646,0.001554952,0.03622176,0.01458444,0.0005829678,0.00531978,0.00005851892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807551,0.0008813349,0.01587465,0.00003238584,0.00001402943,0.00006548181,0.0001888554,0.00003719683,0.002150974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820171,0.0003207472,0.01697503,0.000007094668,0.000007276274,0.0000350195,0.0002015869,0.0000122597,0.0004240228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01521442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03025168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0128169571408639,"score_gpt":0.3098286003364201,"score_spread":0.2970116431955562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}