{"id":"W2975926778","doi":"10.1111/gcb.14845","title":"Gap‐filling approaches for eddy covariance methane fluxes: A comparison of three machine learning algorithms and a traditional method with principal component analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Department of Water Resources; National Research Foundation of Korea; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Eddy covariance; Principal component analysis; Algorithm; Methane; Covariance; Component (thermodynamics); Computer science; Component analysis; Environmental science; Pattern recognition (psychology); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Chemistry; Ecosystem; Statistics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004519625,0.001382638,0.001103783,0.002078945,0.0006154812,0.001126099,0.001416886,0.001338078,0.0008522369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008036962,0.0003657464,0.00111428,0.001522538,0.0005891897,0.001970927,0.00103835,0.001718574,0.0002892951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008755833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001438536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007924031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004841923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985839,0.0005548203,0.0001405493,0.0002732541,0.0003509364,0.0000965412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952525,0.002972286,0.0002752223,0.0003379879,0.001033412,0.0001285558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005896216,0.0003063681,0.006931832,0.0002573314,0.0003157448,0.00005204832,0.0001648706,0.3878628,0.003239831,0.003626738,0.002212801,0.59444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001805689,0.0000598421,0.0009889784,0.000009017908,0.00001551753,0.000009465145,0.00002552024,0.9968251,0.0009719976,0.0007675375,0.0003004784,0.00000856216],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2367417,0.00320769,0.7532831,0.0006802976,0.0002392643,0.0001978528,0.0002723517,0.003262218,0.002115601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4923821,0.0007939046,0.5045425,0.0001819366,0.0001019134,0.00023505,0.0006570381,0.0002216703,0.0008838767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007924031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02390236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1005651676502593,"score_gpt":0.2903182678598666,"score_spread":0.1897531002096073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}