{"id":"W2976434953","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2019.033","title":"Water quality response to river flow regime at three major rivers in Alberta","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Water quality; Environmental science; Streamflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Flow (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Water flow; Water resource management; Geography; Drainage basin; Environmental engineering; Ecology; Geology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002964341,0.0001948832,0.0002146252,0.0006993266,0.0009141123,0.0007388801,0.0003943549,0.0002528522,0.0007440296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005163006,0.0001133147,0.0002119264,0.001328137,0.0005071496,0.000123263,0.0004037628,0.0002228738,0.00006413861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006947206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003728729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9337375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997802,0.00002478294,0.000009686573,0.00004905961,0.00007320807,0.00006313995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996147,0.00005409823,0.00005737337,0.00001151111,0.0001882516,0.00007404534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003090299,0.00009808713,0.9773941,0.00003857082,0.0000683944,0.0002317454,0.00139338,0.002373305,0.006811509,0.0002248785,0.0004866801,0.01057029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002734296,0.00001701818,0.9976268,0.000002589604,0.000009799101,0.00001113607,0.0008861359,0.0008997073,0.0002613085,0.0000208404,0.0002564737,0.000005329092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987727,0.00004149055,0.0001174732,0.00002469593,0.000001362164,0.000009741897,0.0002855388,0.000009366628,0.0007376865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987813,0.00003899205,0.0001771986,0.00001247194,7.564264e-7,0.000005614274,0.0003264942,0.000001643083,0.0006557201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06626248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1333054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09006976425516797,"score_gpt":0.3862194366435602,"score_spread":0.2961496723883923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}