{"id":"W2977069230","doi":"10.1016/j.cma.2019.112633","title":"Second-order cone interior-point method for quasistatic and moderate dynamic cohesive fracture","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quasistatic process; Smoothing; Second-order cone programming; Interior point method; Fracture mechanics; Stiffness; Fracture (geology); Mathematics; Conic section; Mathematical optimization; Convex optimization; Applied mathematics; Regular polygon; Geometry; Structural engineering; Physics; Materials science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008514058,0.0006187305,0.001279383,0.0006768313,0.0005804478,0.0009207171,0.002307227,0.001492478,0.004763765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001706215,0.0004472786,0.0008450139,0.0005683272,0.0007106813,0.0008977226,0.001228185,0.001762941,0.0008683719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004637891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001711486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004894701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005707144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999721,0.00007523695,0.0000120699,0.00002574321,0.0001344808,0.00003157037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993191,0.0002590884,0.00003776528,0.00005339,0.0002753173,0.00005533857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002189383,0.000325296,0.001294724,0.0004366342,0.00005606737,0.0003232129,0.0002453075,0.6834181,0.01022433,0.1737929,0.006048337,0.1236162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007686336,0.000007917948,0.00004806082,0.000005858637,0.000002015534,0.00001285106,0.000004501935,0.9959167,0.0002917257,0.002940596,0.0007579359,0.000004128963],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008963649,0.0001833611,0.9864873,0.00006284143,0.00008679381,0.00005416639,0.00006412843,0.0001698919,0.003927861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2961933,0.0004472542,0.6824409,0.0001452685,0.0001491637,0.0004753959,0.0003317342,0.0007274694,0.01908946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004894701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01593632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008183382625109191,"score_gpt":0.2804559998350676,"score_spread":0.2722726172099584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}