{"id":"W2978102459","doi":"10.1017/s0008423919000556","title":"Retrospective Voting and the Polarization of Available Alternatives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Voting; Ideology; Opposition (politics); Group cohesiveness; Voting behavior; Valence (chemistry); Political science; Polarization (electrochemistry); Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Economics; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007004917,0.0002099736,0.0004856733,0.001069597,0.0008453985,0.002788731,0.0003800573,0.0006219554,0.006410512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05389702,0.0001985,0.0003563683,0.001114433,0.001363751,0.00132098,0.001520067,0.001352695,0.0004369913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008110169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003437047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001674004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943187,0.003549794,0.0002767356,0.000493858,0.0009684839,0.0003923817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9334017,0.04292339,0.01300474,0.004213563,0.00450089,0.001955747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001968063,0.0005874692,0.8902392,0.0001813201,0.0003844899,0.0002715567,0.005337277,0.006032679,0.004897648,0.02729432,0.001372146,0.06143386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005754826,0.0004673447,0.9517741,0.00009391938,0.0001219394,0.0002591002,0.005289063,0.009104429,0.002199296,0.02665845,0.003916812,0.00005803967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838276,0.0001016528,0.001490367,0.0002465608,0.00001465624,0.0000151303,0.00007679686,0.000007752191,0.01421957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999579,0.00001943096,0.0001183451,0.00001206943,0.000007848542,0.000003902526,0.00003552943,0.000002041676,0.0002218917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03704596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02801887908590995,"score_gpt":0.307397991575981,"score_spread":0.2793791124900711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}