{"id":"W2978167827","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/m3s5p","title":"The biases of experts: An empirical analysis of expert witness challenges","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Expert witness; Jurisprudence; Witness; White paper; Position (finance); Affect (linguistics); White (mutation); Political science; Law; Psychology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0347035,0.0002782086,0.0005183591,0.003934674,0.003102743,0.002777794,0.001610389,0.001470772,0.003001956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2347476,0.0002925824,0.0004087764,0.003651253,0.002849293,0.003788649,0.00419746,0.001824114,0.0003960491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002903769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003936005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01700924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02555137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9704037,0.01490508,0.002726951,0.001859695,0.008181879,0.001922705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6275411,0.2922355,0.04533647,0.01117487,0.01986976,0.003842333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004549208,0.0005074784,0.8709126,0.000356466,0.0002347157,0.001259748,0.07741443,0.001068832,0.0004354533,0.008756428,0.003496332,0.03510252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008797899,0.0003899023,0.8213805,0.0007175471,0.0001500832,0.001457672,0.1477837,0.004833198,0.001065029,0.006753263,0.01528024,0.0001008592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921522,0.0005125866,0.001007942,0.0004257392,0.00001259123,0.0002011074,0.0002072096,0.000002036129,0.005478682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983488,0.0002601604,0.0005177495,0.00015269,0.00001572996,0.00009903659,0.000154456,0.000002962701,0.0004484887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0347035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1835319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1762951831273126,"score_gpt":0.4634438026629984,"score_spread":0.2871486195356858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}